Loading BuildVision AI
Organize reviewable electrical and mechanical takeoff items across data-center sheets. Your team verifies redundancy, equipment relationships, design schedules, commissioning scope, procurement assumptions, and final pricing.
Start 14-day trial01 · Estimator review
Review visible generators, switchgear, transformers, UPS equipment, distribution units, busway, panels, and associated repeated symbols by sheet and label.
One-line diagrams and schedules must be reconciled; a plan count does not prove system hierarchy or redundancy.
Review visible cooling units, distribution equipment, pumps, heat exchangers, and other repeated mechanical symbols against schedules and details.
Capacity, duty/standby relationships, controls, and piping assemblies remain design and estimator decisions.
Measure visible tray, busway, conduit, and pathway runs with calibrated geometry and separate them by hall, level, system, or estimator label.
Routing geometry does not determine cable schedules, slack, terminations, supports, or installation productivity.
Redundancy topology, electrical coordination, cooling capacity, controls, commissioning, uptime criteria, long-lead procurement, and system completeness require qualified project review. Confirm the current drawing issue, addenda, specifications, exclusions, and responsible scope before pricing.
Estimator approval remains required before quantities become a bid.
02 · Review workflow
Open the current electrical, mechanical, architectural, controls, and relevant civil or structural data-center sheets.
Inspect pending marks on each source sheet. Accept useful detections, dismiss incorrect groups, and keep ambiguous work out of approved totals.
Add missing equipment counts and calibrated route geometry, label work by hall and system, and keep unresolved schedule or redundancy questions outside approved totals.
Review complete-document totals, then export CSV or create editable quote lines. Apply workspace costs, labor, and commercial terms separately.
03 · Product controls
Run an AI first pass for visible power equipment counts, cooling equipment counts, cable and containment routes. Pending groups stay on the source sheet for individual or bulk review.
Accept useful suggestions and dismiss the wrong ones before downstream use.
Add missing equipment counts and calibrated route geometry, label work by hall and system, and keep unresolved schedule or redundancy questions outside approved totals.
The estimator can correct, add, erase, undo, and redo the working takeoff.
Draw a known line, enter its real distance in feet or metres, and recompute measured quantities when the sheet needs an explicit measurement basis.
Lengths and areas remain editable and tied to a verified scale.
Rename selected work, apply CSI categories, and choose explicit labels so different systems, areas, or bid scopes do not collapse into one unexplained total.
Reviewed quantities stay organized for estimator and team review.
Roll quantities up by label across loaded pages. Complete-document export collects every page and stops with a clear message when the full result cannot be built.
No silent partial total is presented as complete.
Use workspace-owned material, labor, and subcontractor cost or sell rows, then carry accepted AI and manual items into editable grouped quote lines.
Company pricing and commercial approval stay under estimator control.
04 · Estimator decisions
Visible plan suggestions can be accepted or dismissed, but they do not prove that every item, note, schedule, detail, or concealed condition has been captured.
Redundancy topology, electrical coordination, cooling capacity, controls, commissioning, uptime criteria, long-lead procurement, and system completeness require qualified project review.
Confirm the current issue, changed sheets, addenda, and conflicting documents. Do not treat a new AI run as an automatic revision comparison or scope decision.
Current supplier quotes, maintained cost rows, labor productivity, waste, equipment, subcontract scope, code, exclusions, overhead, markup, and risk remain separate decisions.
05 · Project context
Review repeated power, cooling, containment, and building-support scope across phased plan sets.
Separate shared infrastructure, halls, cages, and tenant scope with explicit estimator labels.
Review compact repeated modules while preserving equipment schedules and interfaces as separate checks.
Organize power, cooling, and room-level quantities without assuming design or redundancy intent.
Keep existing, removed, relocated, and new scope explicit across current issued drawings.
Buyer questions
Use the plan-linked workflow to review power equipment counts, cooling equipment counts, cable and containment routes. The exact result depends on visible drawing information, scale, labels, and estimator corrections; representative plan testing is essential.
No. Redundancy topology, electrical coordination, cooling capacity, controls, commissioning, uptime criteria, long-lead procurement, and system completeness require qualified project review. BuildVision AI supports the reviewed takeoff and editable outputs; the estimator completes assemblies, pricing, labor, exclusions, and commercial approval.
Yes. Accept or dismiss pending groups, add manual counts or geometry, calibrate measured work, rename items, apply CSI categories, and keep working with undo or redo before export.
BuildVision AI exports every takeoff row to CSV with its source and review state. Quote creation uses accepted AI and manual items only. Missing pages block either output, while uncalibrated measurements appear blank in CSV and must be scaled before quote creation.
The current trial lasts 14 days. Test representative plans and review the pricing page for current plan limits and billing terms.
Your next bid
Open a representative plan, review the AI first pass, complete the scope with manual tools, then export every row with its review state or build quote lines from accepted and manual work.
Start 14-day trial